lawskills
Google
search the Web search LawSkills.com
Did you know you can download our entire database for free?


Resources
[more] 

Georgia Caselaw:
Browse
Greatest Hits

Georgia Code: Browse

(external) Findlaw Georgia Law Resources


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Lawskills.com Georgia Caselaw
MICKAS v. MICKAS.
27105.
NICHOLS, Justice.
Divorce. Hall Superior Court. Before Judge Blackshear.
Ralph Fred Mickas was granted a divorce from Marlene Mickas, and thereafter a motion to set aside and vacate such decree was filed by Marlene Mickas. This motion was overruled and the present appeal filed. Held:
1. The requirements of the Civil Practice Act (Ga. L. 1966, p. 609, as amended) (Code Ann. 81A-104 (e, 1, iii)) that notice of service by publication be published four times at least 7 days apart are met where the publication is made on the same day of successive weeks. See Code Ann. 81A-106 (a), 102-102 (8).
2. It has long been the rule in Georgia that substance and not mere nomenclature controls in determining the nature of pleadings. Chance v. Planters Rural Telephone Co-Op., 219 Ga. 1, 5 (131 SE2d 541). Accordingly, where, as in the present case, the substance of the plaintiff's pleading seeking a divorce was sufficient to comport with the statutory requirements whether denominated as a "complaint" or "petition" is immaterial.
3. Allegations that the defendant is a resident of another state and that the plaintiff has been a resident of the county in Georgia where the divorce action is filed for more than six months is a sufficient allegation of venue. Tate v. Tate, 220 Ga. 393 (139 SE2d 297). Such an allegation is distinguishable from that in Johnson v. Johnson, 222 Ga. 433 (150 SE2d 684) relied upon by the appellant where the allegations were merely that the plaintiff had been a resident of Georgia for six months.
No error of law appearing, the judgment overruling the appellant's motion to vacate and set aside the divorce decree is armed.
G. Gibson Dean, II, for appellee.
Savell, Williams, Cox & Angel, Elmer L. Nash, for appellant.
ARGUED MARCH 15, 1972 -- DECIDED APRIL 6, 1972.
Friday January 9 07:52 CST


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Valid HTML 4.0!

Valid CSS!





Home - Tour - Disclaimer - Privacy - Contact Us
Copyright © 2000,2002,2004 Lawskills.com