" 'It is a well-settled rule of practice and procedure that where one, as here, has been convicted of crime, habeas corpus cannot be used as a substitute for appeal or other remedial procedure for the correction of errors and irregularities; nor can it be used as a second appeal for such purpose. It is an appropriate remedy only when the judgment or sentence under which applicant is being restrained is not merely erroneous but is absolutely void.' Ferguson v. Balkcom, 222 Ga. 676
, 677 (151 SE2d 707
) and cit." Bonner v. Smith, 226 Ga. 250 (3) (174 SE2d 438)
; Bush v. Chappell, 225 Ga. 659
(360 (171 SE2d 128
). Nor can it be used to review alleged errors in the court's instructions to the jury. See Shoemake v. Whitlock, 226 Ga. 771 (177 SE2d 677)
Accordingly, the enumerations of error, all of which either relate to admission of evidence, the overrulings of motions for mistrial and the charge of the court fail to show any reversible error in remanding the prisoner to the custody of the warden to complete his sentence.
Hester & Hester, Frank B. Hester, for appellant.