Jerry Stevens appeals from the judgment convicting him of murder and sentencing him to life imprisonment.
1. Enumerated errors which attempt to raise for the first time questions which were not raised in the trial court present nothing for decision. See Watson v. State, 227 Ga. 698
, 699 (182 SE2d 446
) and cit.; Patterson v. State, 228 Ga. 389
, 390 (185 SE2d 762
) and cit. The following three enumerated errors are in this category: (a) No. 1: The denial of the defendant's alleged motion for a change of venue. This motion does not appear in the record. (b) No. 5: The alleged denial of the defendant's rights of equal protection under the law and a fair and impartial trial, because of the variance between the workloads and available facilities of appointed counsel and counsel for the State. Even if the law guaranteed to the accused complete equality of counsel with opposing counsel, we find no instances in the record of the trial judge's denying any specific requests regarding the accused's defense other than the motion for continuance, hereinafter considered. (c) No. 6: Defendant's indictment or trial, subsequent to his trial in the present case, for two lesser offenses allegedly arising out of the same act. This is a matter to be raised by pleadings in the two subsequent proceedings alluded to.
2. Enumerated error 2 is the denial of defendant's motion for a continuance, which was based on the ground that he wished to have subpoenaed for a subsequent term of court some witnesses whose names he did not previously know. It is not shown how the testimony of such prospective witnesses would have assisted in appellant's defense or how the defense suffered by the refusal of a continuance. "The statement by counsel that they had not had time to make an adequate investigation of the facts and prepare a proper defense is a mere conclusion. Foster v. State, 213 Ga. 601
, 603 (100 SE2d 426
) . . . Motions for continuance and postponement are addressed to the discretion of the trial judge, and no abuse of discretion is shown in the present case . . ." Margin v. State, 224 Ga. 604
, 605 (163 SE2d 690
) and cit.
3. Enumerated error 3 is the trial court's refusal to charge the jury on manslaughter and self-defense. Since there was no request to so charge and since the issues were raised, if at all, solely by the defendant's unsworn statement, the failure to so charge was not error. Whisman v. State, 221 Ga. 460 (8) (145 SE2d 499)
Early the next morning, all four co-indictees registered under false names at a Savannah hotel at approximately the same time. The next day all four returned to Augusta and two of them tried to sell the manager of the aforesaid bar there $180 in change. One of them left at an Augusta service station a vehicle, from which were recovered the decedent's fully loaded pistol and a map with the location of the Amvets Club marked with an " X" and containing fingerprints of two of appellant's co-indictees. The stolen vehicle, in which the four were riding just before the murder and robbery, was found abandoned and burned across the Savannah River from Savannah a few days later; the stolen billfolds were found buried across the Ogeechee River from Statesboro, together with the non-monetary contents thereof and the pistol which killed the deceased victim; the pistol had been purchased by the appellant a week and a half prior thereto in Augusta, and the serial number had been scratched off. On the day after the murder, appellant contacted his kinsman for aid in "getting out of town" from Augusta and fled the State with false identification papers.
The verdict and judgment were not erroneous for any reason contended.
J. Lane Johnston, District Attorney, for appellee.