lawskills
Loading
Did you know you can download our entire database for free?


Resources
[more] 

Georgia Caselaw:
Browse
Greatest Hits

Georgia Code: Browse

(external) Findlaw Georgia Law Resources


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Lawskills.com Georgia Caselaw
JACKSON v. BALKCOM, Warden.
18462.
Habeas corpus. Before Judge Cowart. Reidsville City Court. October 27, 1953.
HEAD, Justice.
Jurisdiction to try a person accused of a felony is vested by the Constitution of this State in the superior courts thereof. If any of the provisions of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 (Ga. L. 1951, pp. 291-311), Code, Ann. Supp., Ch. 24-24) are intended to withhold this jurisdiction from the superior courts, such provisions can not be given any effect.
The general demurrer of the respondent was sustained, the petition dismissed, and the petitioner remanded to the respondent. The exception is to this judgment.
The only contention made by the petitioner for habeas corpus in the present case as to the illegality of his trial and conviction in the Superior Court of Baldwin County for the offense of rape is that, under the provisions of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 (Ga. L. 1951, pp. 291-311; Code, Ann. Supp., Ch. 24-24), the superior court was without jurisdiction to try his case.
In Hampton v. Stevenson, 210 Ga. 87 (78 S. E. 2d 32), it was held that proceedings under the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 are civil and not criminal, and that such proceedings do not, therefore, violate the Constitution which provides, in article VI, section IV, paragraph I (Code, Ann., 2-3901), that "The Superior Courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction . . . in criminal cases where the offender is subjected to loss of life, or confinement in the penitentiary."
While there is language in sections 9, 10, 11, and 19 of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 which might indicate that it was the intention of the General Assembly to give original jurisdiction to the juvenile courts in all cases pertaining to criminal charges against persons less than seventeen years of age, there is nothing in the act which would have the effect of repealing Code 26-301, which states the age of criminal responsibility to be "14 years, or before that age if such person know the distinction between good and evil." Jurisdiction to try persons charged with felonies, who are accountable under the law, is fixed by the Constitution to be in the superior courts. Constitution, art. VI, sec. IV, par, I (Code, Ann. 2-3901).
This court is entirely in sympathy with the beneficent purposes of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951. However, we can only uphold the purposes of the act consistent with our Constitution. Should any of the provisions of the Juvenile Court Act of 1951 have been intended to withdraw the jurisdiction of the superior courts to try an offender, within the age of accountability under the law, for an offense punishable by death or life imprisonment, as contended by the petitioner, such provisions would be unconstitutional and could be given no effect. Law v. McCord, 143 Ga. 822 (85 S. E. 1025); Hicks v. State, 146 Ga. 706 (92 S. E. 216); Williams v. Davidson, 147 Ga. 491 (94 S. E. 564); Thomas v. State, 174 Ga. 654 (163 S. E. 734); Mills v. Slate, 56 Ga. App. 390 (192 S. E. 730).
The petition for habeas corpus showed no valid reason why the detention of the petitioner was illegal, and the trial court properly sustained the demurrer and remanded the petitioner to the respondent.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.
Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, J. T. Grice, Deputy Assistant Attorney-General, Robert Hall, Lamar Sizemore, Assistant Attorneys-General, contra.
Frank A. Dilworth, III, for plaintiff in error.
ARGUED JANUARY 12, 1954 -- DECIDED FEBRUARY 9, 1954 -- REHEARING DENIED FEBRUARY 24, 1954.
Saturday May 23 03:40 EDT


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Valid HTML 4.0!

Valid CSS!





Home - Tour - Disclaimer - Privacy - Contact Us
Copyright © 2000,2002,2004 Lawskills.com