lawskills
Loading
Did you know you can download our entire database for free?


Resources
[more] 

Georgia Caselaw:
Browse
Greatest Hits

Georgia Code: Browse

(external) Findlaw Georgia Law Resources


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Lawskills.com Georgia Caselaw
CANTRELL v. THE STATE.
A98A0803.
ELDRIDGE, Judge.
Child molestation. Towns Superior Court. Before Judge Barrett.
Jeffery Julian Cantrell appeals from a Towns County jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of aggravated child molestation and two counts of child molestation. His sole enumeration of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence against him. Appellant does not contend that the state failed to prove the offenses, but, instead, contends that "the only direct evidence was from the alleged victim," who was "impeached." Because the evidence was sufficient, we affirm.
Under Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979), the sufficiency of the evidence is measured by determining "whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt." It is solely within the purview of the jury to weigh conflicting evidence and judge the credibility of the witnesses. OCGA 24-9-80; Robinson v. State, 203 Ga. App. 759, 760 (417 SE2d 404) (1992).
Appellant is correct that the victim's testimony is the only direct evidence proving the essential elements of the offenses. 1 However, in incidents of child molestation, more often than not the child/victim is the only witness able to provide such direct evidence. Sexual offenses against children necessarily occur in secret. This is one reason that Georgia law does not require corroboration of a child molestation victim's testimony. Scales v. State, 171 Ga. App. 924 (2) (321 SE2d 764) (1984); see Baker v. State, 245 Ga. 657, 664 (5) (266 SE2d 477) (1980); see also OCGA 24-4-8. Accordingly, "[t]aking the victim's testimony as true, as we must, it alone was clearly sufficient to authorize [Cantrell's] conviction of the [offenses as charged] under the standard set forth in Jackson v. Virginia, [supra]." Bryant v. State, 226 Ga. App. 135, 136 (486 SE2d 374) (1997).
Darrell E. Wilson, District Attorney, Christopher M. Quinn, Assistant District Attorney, for appellee.
Notes
1  The state also presented circumstantial evidence through the testimony of witnesses to whom the victim had made outcry.
Law Offices of Charles Cory, Cary D. Cox, for appellant.
DECIDED MARCH 25, 1998.
Thursday May 21 04:05 EDT


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Valid HTML 4.0!

Valid CSS!





Home - Tour - Disclaimer - Privacy - Contact Us
Copyright © 2000,2002,2004 Lawskills.com