Randy Palmore was convicted of murder and sentenced to life in prison for the shooting death of Sean Sheffield. 1 He appeals, enumerating the sufficiency of the evidence and the denial of his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal.

Evidence was adduced that while Sheffield was talking to friends in the parking lot of a local club, appellant walked up from behind Sheffield, tapped him on the shoulder and called his name. When Sheffield turned, appellant shot him in the chest. Appellant fired twice more as the victim attempted to flee, striking the victim a second time in the chest and also in the hip. Expert testimony established that the victim died as a result of the two chest wounds, one shot having been fired from a distance of less than two inches. Several witnesses to the shooting testified that the victim was unarmed and had no time to make any threatening motions (i.e., reach for a weapon) before appellant shot him. There was evidence that appellant harbored a grudge against the victim because of his involvement in a beating appellant had sustained a week earlier.

Two defense witnesses testified that the victim was armed and had reached for his weapon before appellant fired. Appellant testified that he did not intend to hurt the victim when he first approached and that he fired the shots in self-defense.

As to whether all of the evidence raised any reasonable doubt of the commission of the crime charged or showed appellant acted in self-defense, this is exactly the sort of case where the jury is best empowered to resolve any conflicts in the evidence and determine the credibility of the witnesses and adjudge the facts. Hanson v. State, 258 Ga. 564 (1) (372 SE2d 436) (1988); Latham v. State, 195 Ga. App. 355 (1) (393 SE2d 498) (1990). Viewing the evidence in favor of the jury's findings, we find there was sufficient evidence from which a rational trier of fact could find appellant guilty of murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). Consequently, the trial court did not err by denying appellant's motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. Davis v. State, 261 Ga. 255 (1) (403 SE2d 813) (1991).