lawskills
Loading
Did you know you can download our entire database for free?


Resources
[more] 

Georgia Caselaw:
Browse
Greatest Hits

Georgia Code: Browse

(external) Findlaw Georgia Law Resources


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Lawskills.com Georgia Caselaw
MORRIS v. MORRIS (two cases).
A97A0877.
A97A1026.
BEASLEY, Judge.
Attorney fees. Fulton Superior Court. Before Judge Etheridge.
These appeals mark the second appearance of this case; the first is reported at Morris v. Morris, 222 Ga. App. 617 (475 SE2d 676) (1996). Appellant Frieda Morris filed a complaint to domesticate a foreign judgment and for modification of child support against her former husband, James Morris. After she voluntarily dismissed the complaint, James Morris moved for attorney fees and expenses of litigation under OCGA 19-6-19 (d) and 9-15-14 (b), which was granted. On appeal, this Court reversed the award under OCGA 19-6-19 (d) and remanded the award under OCGA 9-15-14 (b) for requisite findings. Id. at 618 (2), (3).
On September 13, 1996, the trial court noted this Court's earlier opinion and entered an order that stated a basis for awarding attorney fees. Frieda Morris filed a direct appeal from that order in Case No. A97A0877. She also applied for permission to appeal under the discretionary procedures of OCGA 5-6-35 (a) (10). We granted that application, and the appeal in Case No. A97A1026 followed pursuant to that grant.
Case No. A97A0877
1. This notice of appeal seeks to directly appeal the court's award of attorney fees under OCGA 9-15-14. Such an order is subject to the discretionary procedure of OCGA 5-6-35. This appeal must be dismissed. See Bonnell v. Amtex, Inc., 217 Ga. App. 378 (457 SE2d 590) (1995).
Case No. A97A1026
2. The court below entered its order "on remand" on September 13, 1996, but this Court did not issue the remittitur until September 16, 1996. Until the trial court receives and files the remittitur, it does not have jurisdiction to act. Chambers v. State, 262 Ga. 200 (415 SE2d 643) (1992). The trial court's order of September 13 is a nullity, and the case must be reversed.
James Morris urges that we overlook the fact that the order is a nullity and address the merits of the appeal. We find no authority for such. The cases he cites do not support the proposition that this Court can ignore the nullity of a trial court's action. See Marsh v. Way, 173 Ga. App. 399, 401-402 (2) (326 SE2d 499) (1985); Talley v. City Tank Corp., 158 Ga. App. 130, 133 (1) (279 SE2d 264) (1981). The order cannot be affirmed at this juncture even if the record supports the court's decision.
Rubin, Winter, Rapoport & Hall, Michelle B. Rapoport, Amanda S. Trigg, for appellee.
Beltran & Associates, Frank J. Beltran, Charlotte K. Perrell, for appellant.
DECIDED JUNE 11, 1997.
Thursday May 21 04:46 EDT


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Valid HTML 4.0!

Valid CSS!





Home - Tour - Disclaimer - Privacy - Contact Us
Copyright © 2000,2002,2004 Lawskills.com