We dismissed this appeal from a child custody order for failure to follow the discretionary appeal procedures of OCGA 5-6-35 (a) (2). On reconsideration, appellant argues the order is directly appealable because it involves the termination of parental rights which does not fall within the purview of OCGA 5-6-35 (a) (2). See In the Interest of R. L. Y., M. R. Y. & R. A. Y., 180 Ga. App. 559 (349 SE2d 800) (1986). However, the order in question did not terminate appellant's parental rights; it simply awarded custody of the youngest child to the father and granted visitation rights to appellant.

App. at 559.