lawskills
Loading
Did you know you can download our entire database for free?


Resources
[more] 

Georgia Caselaw:
Browse
Greatest Hits

Georgia Code: Browse

(external) Findlaw Georgia Law Resources


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Lawskills.com Georgia Caselaw
DEKALB COUNTY v. GERARD.
A92A1900.
BEASLEY, Judge.
Discretionary appeal. DeKalb Superior Court. Before Judge Castellani.
Gerard was convicted in the DeKalb Recorder's Court of violations of the county's soil erosion ordinance, and she was fined $2,850. She filed a petition for writ of certiorari in superior court pursuant to OCGA 5-4-1, "for the correction of errors committed by [the] inferior judicatory. . . ." The superior court granted the writ and overturned the convictions. Gerard then flied a motion for an award of attorney fees and litigation expenses pursuant to OCGA 9-15-14, which applies "[i]n any civil action in any court of record of this state. . . ." OCGA 9-15-14 (a). Holding that the proceedings in superior court but not recorder's court were civil in nature, the superior court awarded those attorney fees which it found to have been reasonably incurred in connection with counsel's representation of Gerard in superior court. We granted the county's application for discretionary appeal, which was brought under OCGA 5-6-35 (a) (10). We reverse.
1. A prosecution for violation of a city or county ordinance is a "quasi-criminal" case having the nature of a criminal case, and where a party convicted of an ordinance violation files a petition for certiorari in superior court seeking review of the conviction, the proceeding in superior court is criminal and not civil. City of Gainesville v. Butts, 127 Ga. App. 140, 141 (193 SE2d 59) (1972), and the decisions cited therein; Commissioners of Pilotage of St. Simons v. Tabbott, 72 Ga. 89, 91 (1883). See also OCGA 5-4-13; 5-4-20 (a). " ' "The decision of the superior court on certiorari reversing the judgment of a municipal court convicting one of a violation of a municipal ordinance is not subject to review by [the Court of Appeals]." [Cits.]' [Cits.] . . . Only the accused may appeal an adverse judgment in a criminal proceeding. [OCGA 5-6-33]." Butts, supra at 141. The county concedes that it could not appeal the superior court's grant of the writ.
2. Because OCGA 9-15-14 does not apply to the certiorari proceedings in this case, it is unnecessary to reach the enumeration challenging the amount of the award.
Schreeder, Wheeler & Flint, Warren O. Wheeler, Mark W. Forsling, for appellee.
Albert S. Johnson, Nancy F. Rigby, for appellant.
DECIDED JANUARY 7, 1993.
Saturday May 23 15:49 EDT


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Valid HTML 4.0!

Valid CSS!





Home - Tour - Disclaimer - Privacy - Contact Us
Copyright © 2000,2002,2004 Lawskills.com