lawskills
Google
search the Web search LawSkills.com
Did you know you can download our entire database for free?


Resources
[more] 

Georgia Caselaw:
Browse
Greatest Hits

Georgia Code: Browse

(external) Findlaw Georgia Law Resources


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Lawskills.com Georgia Caselaw
CALLICOTT v. REEVES & WAGNER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
A91A0427.
MCMURRAY, Presiding Judge.
Action on note. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Carnes.
This is a suit on a note. Defendant Callicott answered denying the allegations of the complaint filed by plaintiff Reeves & Wagner Construction Company, Inc. Plaintiff moved for summary judgment with a supporting affidavit establishing a prima facie case. Shortly before a hearing on plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, defendant amended his answer so as to deny any consideration to defendant for the alleged indebtedness. Defendant appeals the grant of plaintiff's motion for summary judgment. Held:
The note in question recites that it was given in lieu of a lien being filed and for payment of work performed by plaintiff for North Atlanta Homes, Inc. Defendant signed the note twice, first as president of North Atlanta Homes, Inc., and again individually.
"A person who lends his name to another party to a negotiable instrument in any capacity is an 'accommodation party.' [OCGA 11-3-415.1 He is an accommodation party regardless of whether he received any compensation for so acting or did so gratuitously, and he cannot legally assert lack of consideration for his accommodation since the value received by the principal debtor is the consideration for which the accommodation party bargained. [Cits.]" Motz v. Landmark First Nat. Bank &c., 154 Ga. App. 858, 859 (1) (270 SE2d 81). See also Lewis v. C & S Nat. Bank, 139 Ga. App. 855, 857 (1a) (229 SE2d 765). Contrary to defendant's contention, we do not view Mann Elec. Co. v. Webco Southern Corp., 194 Ga. App. 541 (390 SE2d 905), to be relevant to the case sub judice.
Plaintiff has requested this Court to assess ten percent damages against defendant for frivolous appeal pursuant to OCGA 5-6-6. Plaintiff's motion to assess damages is denied.
Fred J. Hanna, for appellee.
Goldstein & Redic, James A. Goldstein, Patrick R. Matarrese, for appellant.
DECIDED APRIL 1, 1991.
Thursday January 8 23:07 CST


This site exists because of donors like you.

Thanks!


Valid HTML 4.0!

Valid CSS!





Home - Tour - Disclaimer - Privacy - Contact Us
Copyright © 2000,2002,2004 Lawskills.com