In State v. Carr, 261 Ga. 845 (413 SE2d 192) (1992), we affirmed the denial of the State's motion, made pursuant to Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79 (106 SC 1712, 90 LE2d 69) (1986), to require the defendant, an African-American, to articulate race-neutral reasons for using 15 peremptory strikes to remove 15 white persons from the jury. 1 In doing so, we relied on our decision in State v. McCollum, 261 Ga. 473 (405 SE2d 688) (1991).

Subsequently, the United States Supreme Court reversed McCollum. See Georgia v. McCollum, 505 U. S. ____ (112 SC 2348, 120 LE2d 33) (1992). That court also granted certiorari to State v. Carr and remanded Carr to us to consider in light of its decision in Georgia v. McCollum.

In Georgia v. McCollum, the U. S. Supreme Court held that the United States Constitution prohibits a criminal defendant from exercising his or her peremptory strikes in a purposeful, racially discriminatory manner. The Court concluded that if the State makes a prima facie showing of racial discrimination, the defendant will be required to articulate racially neutral explanations for the exercise of his or her peremptory strikes. Id., 112 SC at 2359.

We therefore vacate the judgment of this court in this case, and reverse the decision of the trial court. The case is remanded to the trial court to conduct further proceedings in a manner consistent with Georgia v. McCollum, supra.

Maloy & Jenkins, W. Bruce Maloy, Mary Erickson, Michael J. Moses, for appellee.