Thomas Jefferson Shropshire appeals his conviction for the felony murder of Arthur Young, Jr. We affirm. 11. Appellant raises the general grounds. The evidence, when considered most favorably to the jury's determination, showed that for several years appellant had a relationship with a woman named Mary Chapman. Chapman attempted to end the relationship, and began a relationship with the victim. However, appellant attempted to continue his relationship with Chapman. After meeting with Chapman on the day of the killing, appellant confronted the victim, who was in Chapman's house. Appellant fired a gun into the house, fatally wounding the victim. At the date of the shooting, appellant was a convicted felon. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient to meet the requirements of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 2. Appellant asserts that the trial court's charge on felony murder and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon erroneously allowed the jury to convict him based on an underlying felony that was a "status" offense. This assertion has no merit. Appellant failed to preserve this issue for appellate review. See Bryant v. State, 256 Ga. 273 (1) (347 SE2d 567) (1986). Moreover, the trial court charged the jury that it was required to find some connection between the homicide and the underlying felony, and our review of the record shows that there was evidence of the requisite connection. Hall v. State, 259 Ga. 243, 244 (1) ( 378 SE2d 860) (1989). Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Carl P. Greenberg, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Richard C. Litwin, for appellee. | 
