When the husband and wife in this case entered into a settlement agreement prior to their divorce in 1980, they created a joint tenancy with a right of survivorship 1 in the marital home: The marital home of the parties shall be in the exclusive possession of the Wife and she shall make all payments in connection therewith except that the Husband shall pay off the second mortgage. . . . Title shall be in the name of the parties as joint tenants with right of survivorship. When and if the property is sold while both parties are living, the proceeds shall be divided equally between the parties. In 1987, the husband filed a complaint seeking a partitioning under OCGA 44-6-160, which provides: When two or more persons are common owners of lands and tenements, whether by descent, purchase, or otherwise, and no provision is made, by will or otherwise, as to how such lands and tenements shall be divided, any one of such common owners may apply by petition to the superior court of the county in which such lands and tenements are located for a writ of partition. . . . (Emphasis supplied.) The husband's argument that he is entitled to a partitioning of the property fails for two reasons. First, the Code section upon which he relies has long been construed to apply only to tenants in common, not to joint-tenants with a right of survivorship. See, e.g., Baggs v. Baggs, 54 Ga. 96, 97 (1874); Trimble v. Fairbanks, 209 Ga. 741, 742-43 ( 76 SE2d 16) (1953). See Pindar, Georgia Real Estate Law, 19-13 (3rd ed.). The second reason is that whether the property is held by the husband and wife as tenants in common or as joint-tenants, if it is subject to the exclusive possession of one of them, it is not subject to partitioning by the other. In that event, such as here, the non-possessing spouse's share is said to be "burdened with the provisions recited in the decree. . . ." Rathkamp v. Rathkamp, 136 Ga. App. 423, 424 ( 221 SE2d 221) (1975); 3 Hughes v. Hughes, 169 Ga. App. 850, 854 ( 314 SE2d 920) (1984); Blalock v. Blalock, 250 Ga. 862 (301 SE2d 876) (1983). The trial court properly granted summary judgment to the wife. 4 | 
