App. 68 [(245 SE2d 322
) (1978)]. As a result of this primary liability claimant is entitled to total disability benefits and medical pursuant to OCGA 34-9-261
from G & M Quality Builders, Inc., employer/ principal contractor." Based in part upon this finding, the ALJ entered an award directing that G & M Quality Builders pay workers compensation benefits to Dennison. The full board approved the award with certain modifications not here relevant, and this award was affirmed by the superior court.
Under the facts in this case, the Workers' Compensation Act clearly provides that Dennison's claim may be "directly presented to and instituted against" a principal contractor such as G & M Quality Builders. OCGA 34-9-8
(c). The Act also provides, however, that it shall not apply "to any person, firm, or private corporation . . . that has regularly in service less than three employees in the same business within this state unless such employees and their employers voluntarily elect to be bound." OCGA 34-9-2
(a). In this regard, our Supreme Court has recently held "that in order to sustain a workers' compensation award entered against a general contractor as the statutory employer of an employee of a subcontractor, the award must show that the general contractor has a sufficient number of employees to bring the claim within the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Act." Bradshaw v. Glass, 252 Ga. 429
, 431 (314 SE2d 233
) (1984). The award in this case contains no such showing, nor is the record evidence dispositive of this issue. Compare Smith v. Cornette, 173 Ga. App. 577 (327 SE2d 774) (1985)
; Howell v. Parker, 171 Ga. App. 101 (318 SE2d 811) (1984)
. Therefore, the judgment of the superior court is reversed with direction that the award herein be vacated and the case remanded to the full board for appropriate findings consistent with this opinion.