In this medical malpractice case, the defendant doctor produced his own affidavit as expert describing the plaintiff's condition and treatment, and further stating that in all of the care and treatment rendered by himself to the plaintiff, his care and treatment were standard procedures utilized by the medical profession generally under similar conditions and like surrounding circumstances. The plaintiff produced a doctor's expert affidavit detailing his own subsequent treatment of the plaintiff, but the doctor's affidavit does not aver that the defendant doctor failed to exercise the standard of care in the profession or even was negligent or remiss in any respect. Summary judgment was granted to the defendants and plaintiff appeals, contending it is unconstitutional to allow a defendant doctor to win summary judgment on his own affidavit only, and that the judgment was wrong. The appeal was filed in the Supreme Court because of the constitutional issue, but was transferred here by that court. Held: Accordingly, because the plaintiff has produced no proper affidavit controverting the defendant's expert affidavit evidence that he had complied with the professional standard of care, the summary judgment was correct. Paul M. Hawkins, amicus curiae. | 
