Mark Jackson appeals his conviction of two counts of robbery by intimidation. Held:

1. The victim of both robberies positively identified defendant as the perpetrator thereof. This evidence in addition to the other evidence of record was such that any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. See Blankenship v. State, 159 Ga. App. 75 (282 SE2d 719) (1981).

2. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in permitting the state to reopen after having rested, and before the defense had presented any evidence, for the purpose of tendering certain exhibits into evidence which had been identified but which had inadvertently not been tendered earlier. See State v. Roberts, 247 Ga. 456 (277 SE2d 644) (1981); Davis v. State, 242 Ga. 901 (7) (252 SE2d 443) (1979), vacated on other grounds, Davis v. Georgia, 446 U. S. 961 (1980). The record discloses that these exhibits were admitted into evidence without objection.