Appellant was convicted of burglary. His sole enumeration of error on appeal is that the trial court committed reversible error in failing to charge the jury on the law governing accomplice testimony and the necessity for corroboration thereof. The transcript reveals that appellant neither requested a charge on the law governing the testimony of an accomplice nor excepted to the omission of such charge. Thus, appellant's contention that the trial court erred in failing to so charge is controlled adversely to him by Durham v. State, 41 Ga. App. 421 (2) (153 SE 222) (1930). Williamson v. State, 146 Ga. App. 401 (3) (246 SE2d 421) (1978). See also Jackson v. State, 246 Ga. 459 (271 SE2d 855) (1980). | 
