Misdemeanor accusations were lodged against Laura Joanna Gladson and James Lee Powell, charging that they were persons required by OCGA 19-7-5
to report child abuse; that they had reasonable cause to believe that two children under the age of 18 had been assaulted sexually; and that they knowingly and wilfully failed to report such abuse to an appropriate agency providing protective services. 1
Gladson filed a general demurrer and a motion to dismiss the accusation; Powell filed a plea in abatement and a motion to dismiss the accusation. 2
The primary thrust of these defenses is that, under the due process requirements of both the Georgia Constitution and the Constitution of the United States, the statute is unconstitutional on the grounds of vagueness, in that it failed to identify with reasonable clarity those persons required to report incidents of child abuse. 3
Gladson, a counselor at the firm of Affiliated Counseling & Psychological Services, was told by the mother of two children, ages ten and twelve, that their stepfather had abused them sexually. Gladson was not a licensed psychologist, although she held a doctoral degree in human development from an accredited university. Gladson's counseling activities were supervised by Powell, a licensed psychologist, to whom she reported the alleged child abuse. Powell, in turn, related these circumstances to Dr. Mauger, who was a licensed psychologist and was the head of the firm. The alleged child abuse was not reported to a child welfare agency providing protective services.
1. While the statute may lack clarity in defining some of the classes of persons who are required to make reports of child abuse, OCGA 43-39-7
, together with common usage, provides an adequate definition of the term "psychologist." 4
We import its definition into the term "psychologist" as contained in the criminal statute, and interpret its scope to include only licensed psychologists.
2. Because Gladson is not a licensed psychologist, she cannot be held criminally liable for failure to report the alleged child abuse.
3. Powell, on the other hand, is a licensed psychologist, and may be held criminally liable for failure to so report, assuming the existence of the other elements of the offense.
4. The remainder of the statute, OCGA 19-7-5
, as presently drawn, invites serious constitutional inquiry as to its adequacy in defining classes of persons who are required to make reports of child abuse. However, any such shortcoming is unavailing to Powell. See Gouge v. City of Snellville, 249 Ga. 91
, 93-94 (287 SE2d 539
In this case, even if the outermost boundaries of the applicable section of the ordinance may be imprecise in certain situations . . . we need not make that determination as [defendant's] conduct clearly falls within the "hardcore" of the ordinance's prescriptions, and one to whose conduct a statute clearly applies may not challenge it on the basis that it may be unconstitutionally vague when applied to others. [Cit.]