The holding in State v. Moore is to the effect that the jury instruction which we ruled erroneous will not be henceforth approved but the application thereof is to be prospective only. In conformance with the Supreme Court's direction we hold that the charge given in this case was not error at the time of the trial in this case. See Davis v. State, 237 Ga. 279 (227 SE2d 249) and Cowart v. State, 237 Ga. 282 (227 SE2d 248). ON MOTION FOR REHEARING. Appellant has moved for a rehearing on the basis that "in its decision this court has overlooked the case of Ivan v. City of New York, 407 U. S. 203 (1973) which requires a different holding." Moore, supra, reveals this contention to have also been made there by motion for rehearing and apparently considered to be without merit. "The decisions of the Supreme Court shall bind the Court of Appeals as precedents." Ga. Const., Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. VIII (Code Ann. 2-3708). Motion for rehearing denied. |