The Court of Appeals relied upon the standard set out in In re Pruitt, 249 Ga. 190, 191 (288 SE2d 208) (1982), holding that the trial court's determination was not clearly erroneous. However, in In re Irvin, supra, we adopted for criminal contempt cases the Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979), standard of review: that a rational trier of fact must have been able to find the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration under the holding of In re Irvin, supra. |