92A-2101 et seq.). Appellant contends that his prosecution is barred because of p. 215 (Code Ann. 92A-2115) therein, making "any proceeding under" an arrest by such officers null and void. The denial of this motion was certified for appeal. Held:

This contention has been decided adversely to appellant in Rogers v. State, 133 Ga. App. 513 (211 SE2d 373), where we stated: "The indictment, trial, and conviction of the defendants was not a 'proceeding under' an arrest. . . It is inconceivable to us that the legislature intended to absolve a man of all guilt of a crime charged merely because his arrest was illegal, as contended by the appellant, and we will not so hold."