The order recites that the matter had been set for a hearing that day and no objections having been brought the final report as amended in other particulars was approved, payment of the claims approved as recommended, and the ancillary receiver discharged. Appellant filed a copy of its letter to the ancillary receiver with the clerk of the court on October 20, 1975.

Appellant asserts in this appeal that the court erred in not allowing interest on its judgment. It argues that the ancillary receiver's final report shows there were sufficient funds on hand to pay such interest. Held:

We do not reach the question of whether appellant was entitled to its claim for interest. The superior court's order for a hearing upon the ancillary receiver's final report is what is known as a "bar order." it specifically directed claimants to appear before the court and make known their objections to the "recommendations of the ancillary receiver as to the disposition of claims." The appellant did not comply with this order. The appellant's letter to the ancillary receiver voicing objections, a copy of which was sent to the Fulton County judge not assigned to preside at the hearing, was not a compliance with the "show cause" order. Generally failure to comply with a "bar order" in receivership proceedings after notice precludes sharing in assets. Industrial Realty Co. v. International Reinsurance Corp., 183 Ga. 605 (189 SE 49) (1936). See Suttles v. J. B. Withers Cigar Co., 194 Ga. 617 (22 SE2d 129) (1942); Code Ann. 37-410. Similarly failure to comply with a "bar order" directing claimants to appear and make known their objections to the receiver's final report and recommendations generally precludes later objections. Preferred Ins. Co. v. Bentley, 225 Ga. 160, 163 (166 SE2d 340) (1969). Appellant after notice did not make his objections known to the court within the time allowed. It can not now complain after dissolution of the receivership proceedings and discharge of the ancillary receiver.