1. Since the death certificate tendered in evidence was not completed in accordance with Code (Ann.) 88-1116, that certificate is not prima facie evidence of the facts stated therein.

2. The evidence authorized the finding that the deceased either died from a cerebral hemorrhage or coronary occlusion (under the law and facts of this case, it does not matter which) and that such attack was precipitated by the deceased's exertion in the performance of his employment duties.

Mrs. Viola Roberson Pulliam filed a claim for workmen's compensation against Dan River Mills, Inc., and its carrier, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company, contending that her husband's death was die to an accident arising out of and in the scope of his employment. The single director awarded compensation. On appeal to the full board that board also awarded compensation. The superior court on appeal affirmed the full board's award and the employer and carrier except.

2. The evidence showed that, from fifteen to twenty-five minutes prior to the time the deceased was found in a dying condition, he had walked down and back up a flight of twenty-eight steps. The testimony of Dr. Andrews was that in his opinion the deceased either died from a coronary occlusion or cerebral hemorrhage which could have been caused by the exertion in descending and ascending the stairs. It matters little whether the deceased died from cerebral hemorrhage or coronary occlusion. If it was a cerebral hemorrhage the case of Hartford Accident &c. Co. v. Waters, 87 Ga. App. 117 (73 S. E. 2d 70) is applicable. Where death ensues directly and immediately from a coronary occlusion, the principle is the same as that announced in the Waters case as to cerebral hemorrhage.

From the testimony of Dr. Andrews and other circumstances shown by the evidence, the hearing director was authorized to find that the deceased died either from a cerebral hemorrhage or a coronary occlusion (under the facts of the case it does not matter which) which was precipitated by the exertion expended in the performance of his employment duties.

The court did not err in affirming the award.