Appellant was convicted of simple sodomy and appeals on the general grounds. He argues that since simple sodomy is a consensual act, the other person involved was an accomplice whose testimony was not corroborated as required by OCGA 24-4-8
(Code Ann. 38-121). This contention is without merit, for "the testimony of a consenting partner to a sexual offense needs no corroboration." Motes v. State, 161 Ga. App. 173
, 174 (3) (288 SE2d 256
) (1982). Further, appellant testified and admitted committing sodomy, and our Supreme Court has held that " 'a confession alone is sufficient to corroborate the testimony of an accomplice, so as to support a verdict of guilty.' " Sims v. State, 229 Ga. 33
, 34 (189 SE2d 68
) (1972). See also Jackson v. State, 153 Ga. App. 462
, 463 (4) (265 SE2d 368
) (1980). Thus, the evidence was sufficient to support the verdict and meet the requirements of Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).