The appellant Lupo appeals from the denial of his petition for contempt brought against Long. We affirm.
2. The second enumeration contends, "The evidence was sufficient to support the appellant's claim that the appellee had violated the injunction and was in contempt of court." We agree. But the evidence was likewise sufficient to support the appellee's claim that he had not violated the injunction and was not in contempt. The court's resolution of this dispute was not without evidentiary support and therefore will not be disturbed.